The study, published in Nature, shows coastal restoration on a smaller local scale isn’t going to cut through the mud without larger scale catchment change.
Three of the co-authors Professor Giovanni Coco, Dr Danghan Xie and Professor Karin Bryan.
Contributing author, oceanographer Professor Karin Bryan from the University of Waikato says, “Going into the work we thought we knew what was going to happen, but the modelling showed surprisingly different outcomes – mangroves do not trap and cause sedimentation build up as we’d anticipated”.
The researchers used computational models based on New Zealand estuaries to assess sedimentation inputs, and the frictional effects of mangroves on the sedimentation.
Professor Bryan worked within the NIWA Future Coasts Aotearoa programme to build evidence of impacts and restoration efforts on local low land coastal ecosystems.
“We know changes in upstream land-use like deforestation have significantly changed downstream coastal and estuarine ecosystems. We wanted to look at how levels of up-stream sedimentation interact with down-stream vegetation like mangroves to assess the efficacy of certain remedial efforts at a local-scale,” says Professor Bryan.
Mangroves
The results show that coastal mangrove removal initiatives, guided by knowledge on local-scale effects, cannot stop or mitigate mud-infilling of estuaries to restore previous sandy ecosystems.
“The removal of mangroves enhances estuary-scale sediment. This means human interventions like vegetation removal in estuaries can lead to counterintuitive results that actually impede restoration efforts, highlighting that more holistic management approaches are needed,” says Professor Bryan.
Again, research points to solutions needing to be found within the larger scale catchments – for example the reduction of sedimentation loss from up-stream land-use practise.
Lead author on the paper Dr Danghan Xie (Boston University), undertook research as part of his PhD at Utrecht University.
